Technology in Cyberpunk
Posted by PsychochildFeb 17
Seems a bit of an odd topic? But, think about it. Besides the network, neural interface, and abstractly futuristic portable computers, what sorts of modern technology is really in cyberpunk?
Let’s take a look, shall we?
As I wrote in last week’s post, there’s an assumption that a lot of technology has stagnated. Most stories assume that we don’t have very capable space transportation available, so we’re stuck on the planet or nearby orbit. A lot of the advances that would come from advanced propulsion don’t exist.
The dystopian nature also means that most of the looming problems haven’t been solved. How do we feed people? Most cyberpunk genre pieces talk about things that would freak the mundanes: tanks where they grow protein efficiently, food made from algae, or food made from… other sources. Pollution, overcrowding, and all sorts of other problems still exist, perhaps in greater force than we might anticipate.
Any technology that does come along seems to be mostly focused on computers. “Uploading” a human personality/consciousness, developing an independent artificial intelligence, or ways to secure information (or break that security) are common in stories. Also, we tend to have advancements in transportation: low earth orbit rockets that whisk the protagonists to the next set piece are a common advancement.
Oh, and of course, we do see some advancements in weapons. But, even in the super-futuristic Ghost in the Shell, we still see metal slugs being thrown around instead of phaser beams like in Star Trek. Even cybernetic body replacement seems to focus on making an individual more capable at combat rather than for purposes of extending life in many cases.
But, this isn’t entirely true. The super-rich seem to have a lot of advances in technology that don’t seem to trickle down to the common man. Gene therapies to reduce aging, hydroponics to raise real food, even something that should be mundane like space tourism remain the province of only the super-wealthy.
So, here’s a question to ponder: Why are computers so highly developed when other technology has largely fallen by the wayside? Would cyberpunk still be “cyberpunk” if there were advancements in technology to match computers? What other examples of technology jumping forward can you find in cyberpunk stories?
(P.S. Sorry for posting late. Been a busy week!)
6 comments
Comment by unwesen on February 18, 2011 at 4:32 AM
Well, in The Diamond Age, they have the ability to grow just about any object they want… that in itself is about as game changing a technology as you can imagine.
Stephenson probably realized that if everyone had unlimited access to this tech, a cyberpunk/dystopian setting would be hard to realize, so he limited availability by claimung some groups of people preferred not to use it (more or less).
I’d think that in the same way that SF authors invent ways for traveling between distant stars quickly in order to make their stories work, in cyberpunk you’ll find authors inventing restrictions to tech availability.
I recall in a pen&paper world where I wanted to mix magic and high tech a little, but keep control over how much it mixed, I used a non-uniform field of magical energy as an excuse that granted mana, but made technology of a given complexity simply not work. Cheap, but works.
Comment by anarchotoads on February 18, 2011 at 8:27 AM
I suppose this sort of plays into the high tech/low life thing a bit. We’re not going to buy a character that has access to everything, which is why we don’t see as much amazing technology. What we do see is stuff we can believe they built themselves or can afford. DIY, I think, is a major part of the cyberpunk ethic.
Comment by Psychochild on February 18, 2011 at 6:20 PM
unwesen wrote:
Well, in The Diamond Age, they have the ability to grow just about any object they want…
I guess now we should argue if The Diamond Age is really cyberpunk. :)
An alternative of the “replication machine” is Transmetropolitan
, where the machines require input. Some people will go hunt garbage to feed into their “makers”, but the stories imply that this produces lower quality replications than having a store-bought block to work with. So, even with a bit of high technology, there are some drawbacks.
anarchotoads wrote:
DIY, I think, is a major part of the cyberpunk ethic.
I’ll agree here. Hard to imagine someone living the “low life” if they can just order up whatever their hearts desire at the moment.
Comment by unwesen on February 19, 2011 at 4:44 PM
Well, from where I’m standing, The Diamond Age is pretty much the evolution of cyberpunk, or one possible evolution, I should say. It lets go of many cyberpunk tropes, yes.
What it’s still got is the presentation of the physical world and the human mind as completely hackable, in the jargon file sense rather than in the popular sense. What differs is mostly the type of technology used to perform that hacking; it’s closer to how we might imagine the next evolution of technical marvels to be, rather than how they were imagined back in the 80s or even before.
Yes, it’s utterly cyberpunk from my point of view. But I also understand it to be very different from other cyberpunk works out there.
Comment by anarchotoads on February 21, 2011 at 5:39 PM
Psychochild; interesting that you mentioned ordering on demand, which reminds me of the underappreciated and discontinued ‘Roadkill’ stories, actually what turned me on to Cyberpunk when I was but a child. The ability to order anything, of course, was limited to the rich in their condos. Amazing books these though, have to recommend them, very disturbing at points for kids novels, when you consider the drug use to manipulate people and cybernetics…
Comment by milieu on March 22, 2011 at 9:54 PM
In the Diamond Age, you still had to pay for things you made. Remember, the girl made a huge number of pillows and her brother freaked when he saw it. They had to put all of the pillows back into the mass converter and hope their drunk mom didn’t notice the bill.
I suspect advanced technologies don’t make it down to the poor because the money is concentrated at the top. So the corporations market and sell to the elites who have the money.